WILD CAUGHT PINK SALMON vs FISHLESS TUNA
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
WILD CAUGHT PINK SALMON wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
WILD CAUGHT PINK SALMON: 5
vs
FISHLESS TUNA: 3
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | WILD CAUGHT PINK SALMON | FISHLESS TUNA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 106 cal | 116 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 16.3 g | |
| Carbs | 0.7 g | 11.6 g | |
| Fat | 3.2 g | 0 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | WILD CAUGHT PINK SALMON | FISHLESS TUNA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 127 MG | 86 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.6 MG | 0 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 151 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 324 MG | 209 MG |