WILD CAUGHT LIGHT IN WATER TUNA vs SLOW COOKED TERIYAKI CHICKEN RICE BOWL
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
WILD CAUGHT LIGHT IN WATER TUNA wins in 7 out of 12 nutrient categories
WILD CAUGHT LIGHT IN WATER TUNA: 7
vs
SLOW COOKED TERIYAKI CHICKEN RICE BOWL: 4
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | WILD CAUGHT LIGHT IN WATER TUNA | SLOW COOKED TERIYAKI CHICKEN RICE BOWL | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 95 cal | 136 cal | |
| Protein | 23.0 g | 6.8 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 25.3 g | |
| Fat | 0.7 g | 1.5 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0.2 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | WILD CAUGHT LIGHT IN WATER TUNA | SLOW COOKED TERIYAKI CHICKEN RICE BOWL | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 10.2 MG | |
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 2 UG | 0 UG |
Minerals
| Mineral | WILD CAUGHT LIGHT IN WATER TUNA | SLOW COOKED TERIYAKI CHICKEN RICE BOWL | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 13 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.2 MG | 1.3 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 284 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 405 MG | 272 MG |