WILD CAUGHT LAKE FISH SMELT vs MATLAW'S
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
MATLAW'S wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
WILD CAUGHT LAKE FISH SMELT: 2
vs
MATLAW'S: 4
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | WILD CAUGHT LAKE FISH SMELT | MATLAW'S | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 94 cal | 118 cal | |
| Protein | 17.7 g | 22.4 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 2.4 g | 1.8 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | WILD CAUGHT LAKE FISH SMELT | MATLAW'S | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | WILD CAUGHT LAKE FISH SMELT | MATLAW'S | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 71 MG | 94 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.9 MG | 0.4 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 59 MG | 953 MG |