WILD CAUGHT IN ALASKA SKINLESS & BONELESS PINK SALMON vs MW POLAR
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
WILD CAUGHT IN ALASKA SKINLESS & BONELESS PINK SALMON wins in 6 out of 12 nutrient categories
WILD CAUGHT IN ALASKA SKINLESS & BONELESS PINK SALMON: 6
vs
MW POLAR: 5
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | WILD CAUGHT IN ALASKA SKINLESS & BONELESS PINK SALMON | MW POLAR | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 94 cal | 118 cal | |
| Protein | 20 g | 15.3 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 1.8 g | |
| Fat | 1.8 g | 5.9 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 1.8 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | WILD CAUGHT IN ALASKA SKINLESS & BONELESS PINK SALMON | MW POLAR | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 2.1 MG | |
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 13 UG | 0 UG |
Minerals
| Mineral | WILD CAUGHT IN ALASKA SKINLESS & BONELESS PINK SALMON | MW POLAR | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 11 MG | 294 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 1.1 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 376 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 282 MG | 459 MG |