WILD CAUGHT ALBACORE TUNA vs CHICKEN OF THE SEA
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
WILD CAUGHT ALBACORE TUNA wins in 3 out of 10 nutrient categories
WILD CAUGHT ALBACORE TUNA: 3
vs
CHICKEN OF THE SEA: 2
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | WILD CAUGHT ALBACORE TUNA | CHICKEN OF THE SEA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 186 cal | 179 cal | |
| Protein | 25.6 g | 21.4 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 10.5 g | 10.7 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | WILD CAUGHT ALBACORE TUNA | CHICKEN OF THE SEA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | WILD CAUGHT ALBACORE TUNA | CHICKEN OF THE SEA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 2.5 MG | 0.6 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 209 MG | 321 MG |