WILD CAUGHT ALBACORE TUNA vs CHICKEN OF THE SEA
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CHICKEN OF THE SEA wins in 3 out of 10 nutrient categories
WILD CAUGHT ALBACORE TUNA: 2
vs
CHICKEN OF THE SEA: 3
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | WILD CAUGHT ALBACORE TUNA | CHICKEN OF THE SEA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 186 cal | 161 cal | |
| Protein | 25.6 g | 23.2 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 10.5 g | 7.1 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | WILD CAUGHT ALBACORE TUNA | CHICKEN OF THE SEA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | WILD CAUGHT ALBACORE TUNA | CHICKEN OF THE SEA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 2.5 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 209 MG | 250 MG |