WILD CAUGHT ALBACORE TUNA vs ALASKAN SOCKEYE SALMON FILLETS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
WILD CAUGHT ALBACORE TUNA wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
WILD CAUGHT ALBACORE TUNA: 5
vs
ALASKAN SOCKEYE SALMON FILLETS: 2
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | WILD CAUGHT ALBACORE TUNA | ALASKAN SOCKEYE SALMON FILLETS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 106 cal | 133 cal | |
| Protein | 22.1 g | 22.1 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 0.9 g | 4.4 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | WILD CAUGHT ALBACORE TUNA | ALASKAN SOCKEYE SALMON FILLETS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 1.1 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | WILD CAUGHT ALBACORE TUNA | ALASKAN SOCKEYE SALMON FILLETS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 35 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.3 MG | 0 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 363 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 35 MG | 80 MG |