WILD CAUGHT ALASKAN SOCKEYE SALMON vs TENDER CALAMARI SQUID RINGS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
TENDER CALAMARI SQUID RINGS wins in 4 out of 11 nutrient categories
WILD CAUGHT ALASKAN SOCKEYE SALMON: 3
vs
TENDER CALAMARI SQUID RINGS: 4
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | WILD CAUGHT ALASKAN SOCKEYE SALMON | TENDER CALAMARI SQUID RINGS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 159 cal | 44 cal | |
| Protein | 21.2 g | 10.6 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 8.0 g | 0 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | WILD CAUGHT ALASKAN SOCKEYE SALMON | TENDER CALAMARI SQUID RINGS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | WILD CAUGHT ALASKAN SOCKEYE SALMON | TENDER CALAMARI SQUID RINGS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 35 MG | 18 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.6 MG | 1.3 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 354 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 44 MG | 407 MG |