WILD ALASKAN PINK SALMON FILLETS vs WILD CAUGHT TUNA STEAKS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
WILD ALASKAN PINK SALMON FILLETS wins in 5 out of 12 nutrient categories
WILD ALASKAN PINK SALMON FILLETS: 5
vs
WILD CAUGHT TUNA STEAKS: 3
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | WILD ALASKAN PINK SALMON FILLETS | WILD CAUGHT TUNA STEAKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 106 cal | 106 cal | Tie |
| Protein | 18.6 g | 23.0 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 3.1 g | 0.9 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | WILD ALASKAN PINK SALMON FILLETS | WILD CAUGHT TUNA STEAKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 1.1 MG | |
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 13 UG | 0 UG |
Minerals
| Mineral | WILD ALASKAN PINK SALMON FILLETS | WILD CAUGHT TUNA STEAKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 27 MG | 18 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.2 MG | 0.6 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 354 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 230 MG | 35 MG |