WILD ALASKA BLUEBACK SALMON vs RIGA GOLD ATLANTIC MACKEREL IN OIL
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
RIGA GOLD ATLANTIC MACKEREL IN OIL wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
WILD ALASKA BLUEBACK SALMON: 2
vs
RIGA GOLD ATLANTIC MACKEREL IN OIL: 4
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | WILD ALASKA BLUEBACK SALMON | RIGA GOLD ATLANTIC MACKEREL IN OIL | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 0 cal | 308 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 15 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 0 g | 27.5 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | WILD ALASKA BLUEBACK SALMON | RIGA GOLD ATLANTIC MACKEREL IN OIL | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | WILD ALASKA BLUEBACK SALMON | RIGA GOLD ATLANTIC MACKEREL IN OIL | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 50 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 1.4 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 0 MG | 462 MG |