WHOLE MUSSELS vs CHINOOK KING SALMON
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
It's a tie, both foods score equally across 16 nutrient categories
WHOLE MUSSELS: 6
vs
CHINOOK KING SALMON: 6
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | WHOLE MUSSELS | CHINOOK KING SALMON | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 94 cal | 133 cal | |
| Protein | 14.1 g | 20 g | |
| Carbs | 4.7 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 2.4 g | 5.9 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | WHOLE MUSSELS | CHINOOK KING SALMON | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Niacin | 0 MG | 4.7 MG | |
| Vitamin B-12 | 0 UG | 1.4 UG | |
| Vitamin B-6 | 0 MG | 0.2 MG | |
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 0 UG | 0 UG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | WHOLE MUSSELS | CHINOOK KING SALMON | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 35 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 4.6 MG | 0.4 MG | |
| Phosphorus, P | 0 MG | 94 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 365 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 329 MG | 66 MG |