WHOLE ALMONDS vs HARRIS TEETER
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
HARRIS TEETER wins in 3 out of 11 nutrient categories
WHOLE ALMONDS: 0
vs
HARRIS TEETER: 3
(8 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | WHOLE ALMONDS | HARRIS TEETER | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 571 cal | 571 cal | Tie |
| Protein | 21.4 g | 21.4 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 21.4 g | 21.4 g | Tie |
| Fat | 50 g | 50 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 14.3 g | 14.3 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | WHOLE ALMONDS | HARRIS TEETER | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | WHOLE ALMONDS | HARRIS TEETER | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 268 MG | 286 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 3.6 MG | 3.9 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 750 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |