WHITE WINE VINEGAR WITH BALSAMIC VINEGAR OF MODENA vs CHINKIANG VINEGAR
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CHINKIANG VINEGAR wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
WHITE WINE VINEGAR WITH BALSAMIC VINEGAR OF MODENA: 0
vs
CHINKIANG VINEGAR: 5
(6 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | WHITE WINE VINEGAR WITH BALSAMIC VINEGAR OF MODENA | CHINKIANG VINEGAR | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 100 cal | 60 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 6.7 g | |
| Carbs | 20 g | 6.7 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | WHITE WINE VINEGAR WITH BALSAMIC VINEGAR OF MODENA | CHINKIANG VINEGAR | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | WHITE WINE VINEGAR WITH BALSAMIC VINEGAR OF MODENA | CHINKIANG VINEGAR | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 247 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 0 MG | 413 MG |