WHITE TURKEY vs BONELESS FULLY COOKED HAM STEAK
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
BONELESS FULLY COOKED HAM STEAK wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
WHITE TURKEY: 1
vs
BONELESS FULLY COOKED HAM STEAK: 5
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | WHITE TURKEY | BONELESS FULLY COOKED HAM STEAK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 143 cal | 107 cal | |
| Protein | 10.7 g | 16.1 g | |
| Carbs | 7.1 g | 5.4 g | |
| Fat | 5.4 g | 2.7 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | WHITE TURKEY | BONELESS FULLY COOKED HAM STEAK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | WHITE TURKEY | BONELESS FULLY COOKED HAM STEAK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 1.3 MG | 0.6 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 1,214 MG | 1,429 MG |