WHITE TUNA vs CHICKEN OF THE SEA
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CHICKEN OF THE SEA wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
WHITE TUNA: 3
vs
CHICKEN OF THE SEA: 5
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | WHITE TUNA | CHICKEN OF THE SEA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 218 cal | 125 cal | |
| Protein | 20 g | 28.6 g | |
| Carbs | 1.8 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 14.6 g | 1.8 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | WHITE TUNA | CHICKEN OF THE SEA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | WHITE TUNA | CHICKEN OF THE SEA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 36 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.3 MG | 0 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 179 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 382 MG | 250 MG |