WHITE FUDGE ANIMAL COOKIES vs EREWHON
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
EREWHON wins in 5 out of 12 nutrient categories
WHITE FUDGE ANIMAL COOKIES: 3
vs
EREWHON: 5
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | WHITE FUDGE ANIMAL COOKIES | EREWHON | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 500 cal | 419 cal | |
| Protein | 3.3 g | 6.5 g | |
| Carbs | 73.3 g | 77.4 g | |
| Fat | 20 g | 8.1 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.2 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | WHITE FUDGE ANIMAL COOKIES | EREWHON | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 0 UG | 0 UG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | WHITE FUDGE ANIMAL COOKIES | EREWHON | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 267 MG | 65 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.2 MG | 1.2 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 200 MG | 387 MG |