WHITE COOKED PEELED AND DEVEINED TAIL OFF IQF SHRIMP vs PANAPESCA
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
PANAPESCA wins in 5 out of 12 nutrient categories
WHITE COOKED PEELED AND DEVEINED TAIL OFF IQF SHRIMP: 4
vs
PANAPESCA: 5
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | WHITE COOKED PEELED AND DEVEINED TAIL OFF IQF SHRIMP | PANAPESCA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 60 cal | 91 cal | |
| Protein | 14.3 g | 15 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 2 g | |
| Fat | 0.6 g | 1 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | WHITE COOKED PEELED AND DEVEINED TAIL OFF IQF SHRIMP | PANAPESCA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 7.2 MG | |
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 0 UG | 0 UG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | WHITE COOKED PEELED AND DEVEINED TAIL OFF IQF SHRIMP | PANAPESCA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 33 MG | 60 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.2 MG | 5.0 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 86 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 274 MG | 490 MG |