WHITE CHUNK MACADAMIA SOFT BAKED COOKIES vs FUDGE GRAHAM COOKIES
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
WHITE CHUNK MACADAMIA SOFT BAKED COOKIES wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
WHITE CHUNK MACADAMIA SOFT BAKED COOKIES: 5
vs
FUDGE GRAHAM COOKIES: 3
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | WHITE CHUNK MACADAMIA SOFT BAKED COOKIES | FUDGE GRAHAM COOKIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 393 cal | 478 cal | |
| Protein | 3.6 g | 4.4 g | |
| Carbs | 53.6 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 17.9 g | 21.7 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | WHITE CHUNK MACADAMIA SOFT BAKED COOKIES | FUDGE GRAHAM COOKIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 21 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.7 MG | 3.9 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 71 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 411 MG | 304 MG |