WHITE CHOCOLATE COCONUT ALMONDS vs LUNDS & BYERLYS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
WHITE CHOCOLATE COCONUT ALMONDS wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
WHITE CHOCOLATE COCONUT ALMONDS: 4
vs
LUNDS & BYERLYS: 3
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | WHITE CHOCOLATE COCONUT ALMONDS | LUNDS & BYERLYS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 550 cal | 571 cal | |
| Protein | 10 g | 7.1 g | |
| Carbs | 50 g | 50 g | Tie |
| Fat | 37.5 g | 39.3 g | |
| Fiber | 2.5 g | 7.1 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | WHITE CHOCOLATE COCONUT ALMONDS | LUNDS & BYERLYS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | WHITE CHOCOLATE COCONUT ALMONDS | LUNDS & BYERLYS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 200 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.9 MG | 2.6 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 50 MG | 857 MG |