WAFFLE CONES vs ALMOND SOFT BAKED BISCOTTI
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
ALMOND SOFT BAKED BISCOTTI wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
WAFFLE CONES: 4
vs
ALMOND SOFT BAKED BISCOTTI: 5
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | WAFFLE CONES | ALMOND SOFT BAKED BISCOTTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 381 cal | 367 cal | |
| Protein | 4.8 g | 13.3 g | |
| Carbs | 85.7 g | 43.3 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 15 g | |
| Fiber | 4.8 g | 6.7 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | WAFFLE CONES | ALMOND SOFT BAKED BISCOTTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 90 MG | 80 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 4.8 MG | 2.7 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 190 MG | 350 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 167 MG | 67 MG |