VINTAGE TOMATO KETCHUP vs LEE KUM KEE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
It's a tie — both foods score equally across 10 nutrient categories
VINTAGE TOMATO KETCHUP: 3
vs
LEE KUM KEE: 3
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | VINTAGE TOMATO KETCHUP | LEE KUM KEE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 118 cal | 583 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 16.7 g | |
| Carbs | 23.5 g | 8.3 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 58.3 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | VINTAGE TOMATO KETCHUP | LEE KUM KEE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 21.2 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | VINTAGE TOMATO KETCHUP | LEE KUM KEE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 1,000 MG | 1,500 MG |