VAN-O LUNCH vs PISTACHIO ALMOND THIN COOKIES
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
PISTACHIO ALMOND THIN COOKIES wins in 6 out of 10 nutrient categories
VAN-O LUNCH: 2
vs
PISTACHIO ALMOND THIN COOKIES: 6
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | VAN-O LUNCH | PISTACHIO ALMOND THIN COOKIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 489 cal | 500 cal | |
| Protein | 4.3 g | 17.9 g | |
| Carbs | 72.3 g | 57.1 g | |
| Fat | 19.2 g | 21.4 g | |
| Fiber | 2.1 g | 3.6 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | VAN-O LUNCH | PISTACHIO ALMOND THIN COOKIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | VAN-O LUNCH | PISTACHIO ALMOND THIN COOKIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 71 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 2.3 MG | 3.9 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 287 MG | 304 MG |