UNCURED BISON HOT DOGS vs CHICKEN FRANKS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CHICKEN FRANKS wins in 6 out of 10 nutrient categories
UNCURED BISON HOT DOGS: 2
vs
CHICKEN FRANKS: 6
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | UNCURED BISON HOT DOGS | CHICKEN FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 268 cal | 188 cal | |
| Protein | 14.3 g | 14.6 g | |
| Carbs | 3.6 g | 6.3 g | |
| Fat | 21.4 g | 10.4 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | UNCURED BISON HOT DOGS | CHICKEN FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 18.8 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | UNCURED BISON HOT DOGS | CHICKEN FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 125 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.9 MG | 1.5 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 946 MG | 979 MG |