TUSCAN STYLE WHITE BEAN SLOW COOKER SOLUTIONS vs HASHBROWN POTATOES
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
TUSCAN STYLE WHITE BEAN SLOW COOKER SOLUTIONS wins in 7 out of 11 nutrient categories
TUSCAN STYLE WHITE BEAN SLOW COOKER SOLUTIONS: 7
vs
HASHBROWN POTATOES: 3
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | TUSCAN STYLE WHITE BEAN SLOW COOKER SOLUTIONS | HASHBROWN POTATOES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 238 cal | 412 cal | |
| Protein | 19.1 g | 5.9 g | |
| Carbs | 59.5 g | 76.5 g | |
| Fat | 3.6 g | 5.9 g | |
| Fiber | 28.6 g | 5.9 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | TUSCAN STYLE WHITE BEAN SLOW COOKER SOLUTIONS | HASHBROWN POTATOES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 28.2 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | TUSCAN STYLE WHITE BEAN SLOW COOKER SOLUTIONS | HASHBROWN POTATOES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 90 MG | 118 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 5.2 MG | 0 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 1,119 MG | 559 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 262 MG | 1,941 MG |