TUNA SALAD vs CHOPPED ASIAN-STYLE BLEND OF SAVOY CABBAGE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CHOPPED ASIAN-STYLE BLEND OF SAVOY CABBAGE wins in 6 out of 11 nutrient categories
TUNA SALAD: 4
vs
CHOPPED ASIAN-STYLE BLEND OF SAVOY CABBAGE: 6
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | TUNA SALAD | CHOPPED ASIAN-STYLE BLEND OF SAVOY CABBAGE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 292 cal | 124 cal | |
| Protein | 14.2 g | 4.5 g | |
| Carbs | 7.1 g | 17.5 g | |
| Fat | 23.9 g | 4.5 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.8 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | TUNA SALAD | CHOPPED ASIAN-STYLE BLEND OF SAVOY CABBAGE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 16.9 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | TUNA SALAD | CHOPPED ASIAN-STYLE BLEND OF SAVOY CABBAGE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 12 MG | 34 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0.6 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 143 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 469 MG | 305 MG |