TUNA PORTIONS vs WILD PACIFIC ROCKFISH FILLET
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
WILD PACIFIC ROCKFISH FILLET wins in 5 out of 12 nutrient categories
TUNA PORTIONS: 3
vs
WILD PACIFIC ROCKFISH FILLET: 5
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | TUNA PORTIONS | WILD PACIFIC ROCKFISH FILLET | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 125 cal | 214 cal | |
| Protein | 25.9 g | 44.3 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 1.8 g | 3.6 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | TUNA PORTIONS | WILD PACIFIC ROCKFISH FILLET | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | TUNA PORTIONS | WILD PACIFIC ROCKFISH FILLET | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 4 MG | 29 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.8 MG | 0.5 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 394 MG | 943 MG | |
| Selenium, Se | 0 UG | 150 UG | |
| Sodium, Na | 22 MG | 179 MG |