TUNA POKE CUBES vs 3-5 LB WG KING MACKEREL
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
It's a tie, both foods score equally across 11 nutrient categories
TUNA POKE CUBES: 4
vs
3-5 LB WG KING MACKEREL: 4
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | TUNA POKE CUBES | 3-5 LB WG KING MACKEREL | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 106 cal | 107 cal | |
| Protein | 23.9 g | 19.6 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 0.4 g | 1.8 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | TUNA POKE CUBES | 3-5 LB WG KING MACKEREL | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 1.6 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | TUNA POKE CUBES | 3-5 LB WG KING MACKEREL | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 31 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.9 MG | 1.8 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 442 MG | 438 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 44 MG | 161 MG |