TUNA POKE CUBES vs 2/4 OZ IQF POLLOCK FILLET
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
TUNA POKE CUBES wins in 4 out of 11 nutrient categories
TUNA POKE CUBES: 4
vs
2/4 OZ IQF POLLOCK FILLET: 3
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | TUNA POKE CUBES | 2/4 OZ IQF POLLOCK FILLET | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 106 cal | 89 cal | |
| Protein | 23.9 g | 19.6 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 0.4 g | 0.9 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | TUNA POKE CUBES | 2/4 OZ IQF POLLOCK FILLET | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | TUNA POKE CUBES | 2/4 OZ IQF POLLOCK FILLET | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 46 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.9 MG | 0.3 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 442 MG | 357 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 44 MG | 89 MG |