TREK & TRAIL ALMONDS vs LUNDS & BYERLYS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
TREK & TRAIL ALMONDS wins in 6 out of 11 nutrient categories
TREK & TRAIL ALMONDS: 6
vs
LUNDS & BYERLYS: 4
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | TREK & TRAIL ALMONDS | LUNDS & BYERLYS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 533 cal | 534 cal | |
| Protein | 13.3 g | 24.1 g | |
| Carbs | 46.7 g | 17.2 g | |
| Fat | 33.3 g | 44.8 g | |
| Fiber | 6.7 g | 3.4 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | TREK & TRAIL ALMONDS | LUNDS & BYERLYS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 2.1 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | TREK & TRAIL ALMONDS | LUNDS & BYERLYS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 93 MG | 34 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 2.3 MG | 14.9 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 477 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 117 MG | 17 MG |