TREK & TRAIL ALMONDS vs LUNDS & BYERLYS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
LUNDS & BYERLYS wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
TREK & TRAIL ALMONDS: 4
vs
LUNDS & BYERLYS: 5
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | TREK & TRAIL ALMONDS | LUNDS & BYERLYS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 533 cal | 583 cal | |
| Protein | 13.3 g | 22.2 g | |
| Carbs | 46.7 g | 19.4 g | |
| Fat | 33.3 g | 50 g | |
| Fiber | 6.7 g | 11.1 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | TREK & TRAIL ALMONDS | LUNDS & BYERLYS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | TREK & TRAIL ALMONDS | LUNDS & BYERLYS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 93 MG | 250 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 2.3 MG | 4.5 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 477 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 117 MG | 0 MG |