TRADITIONAL WHITE POCKET-LESS PITA vs CLASSIC DINNER ROLLS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CLASSIC DINNER ROLLS wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
TRADITIONAL WHITE POCKET-LESS PITA: 3
vs
CLASSIC DINNER ROLLS: 5
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | TRADITIONAL WHITE POCKET-LESS PITA | CLASSIC DINNER ROLLS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 291 cal | 256 cal | |
| Protein | 10.1 g | 9.3 g | |
| Carbs | 50.6 g | 48.8 g | |
| Fat | 5.7 g | 2.3 g | |
| Fiber | 2.5 g | 2.3 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | TRADITIONAL WHITE POCKET-LESS PITA | CLASSIC DINNER ROLLS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | TRADITIONAL WHITE POCKET-LESS PITA | CLASSIC DINNER ROLLS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 101 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 2.3 MG | 2.8 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 392 MG | 442 MG |