TRADITIONAL STYLE SOCKEYE RED SALMON vs MACKEREL FILLETS IN OIL
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
TRADITIONAL STYLE SOCKEYE RED SALMON wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
TRADITIONAL STYLE SOCKEYE RED SALMON: 5
vs
MACKEREL FILLETS IN OIL: 1
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | TRADITIONAL STYLE SOCKEYE RED SALMON | MACKEREL FILLETS IN OIL | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 175 cal | 321 cal | |
| Protein | 20.6 g | 17.9 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 11.1 g | 26.8 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | TRADITIONAL STYLE SOCKEYE RED SALMON | MACKEREL FILLETS IN OIL | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | TRADITIONAL STYLE SOCKEYE RED SALMON | MACKEREL FILLETS IN OIL | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 159 MG | 54 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.6 MG | 0.3 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 429 MG | 589 MG |