TRADITIONAL SEITAN SLICES vs SLOW ROASTED CHICK'N TANDOORI
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
TRADITIONAL SEITAN SLICES wins in 5 out of 12 nutrient categories
TRADITIONAL SEITAN SLICES: 5
vs
SLOW ROASTED CHICK'N TANDOORI: 4
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | TRADITIONAL SEITAN SLICES | SLOW ROASTED CHICK'N TANDOORI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 153 cal | 198 cal | |
| Protein | 25.9 g | 25.3 g | |
| Carbs | 7.1 g | 9.9 g | |
| Fat | 3.5 g | 6.6 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.2 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | TRADITIONAL SEITAN SLICES | SLOW ROASTED CHICK'N TANDOORI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 0 UG | 0 UG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | TRADITIONAL SEITAN SLICES | SLOW ROASTED CHICK'N TANDOORI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 28 MG | 66 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 2.4 MG | 2.0 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 118 MG | 352 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 400 MG | 495 MG |