TRADITIONAL PORK SAUSAGE LINKS vs BEEF FRANKS IN A BLANKET
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
BEEF FRANKS IN A BLANKET wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
TRADITIONAL PORK SAUSAGE LINKS: 3
vs
BEEF FRANKS IN A BLANKET: 4
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | TRADITIONAL PORK SAUSAGE LINKS | BEEF FRANKS IN A BLANKET | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 400 cal | 288 cal | |
| Protein | 11.1 g | 9.4 g | |
| Carbs | 2.2 g | 15.3 g | |
| Fat | 37.8 g | 21.2 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | TRADITIONAL PORK SAUSAGE LINKS | BEEF FRANKS IN A BLANKET | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | TRADITIONAL PORK SAUSAGE LINKS | BEEF FRANKS IN A BLANKET | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 24 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.8 MG | 0.9 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 733 MG | 247 MG |