TRADITIONAL ITALIAN STYLE SWEET DRY CURED CAPOCOLLO vs COOKED HAM
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
TRADITIONAL ITALIAN STYLE SWEET DRY CURED CAPOCOLLO wins in 3 out of 10 nutrient categories
TRADITIONAL ITALIAN STYLE SWEET DRY CURED CAPOCOLLO: 3
vs
COOKED HAM: 2
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | TRADITIONAL ITALIAN STYLE SWEET DRY CURED CAPOCOLLO | COOKED HAM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 321 cal | 107 cal | |
| Protein | 28.6 g | 17.9 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 3.6 g | |
| Fat | 21.4 g | 3.6 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | TRADITIONAL ITALIAN STYLE SWEET DRY CURED CAPOCOLLO | COOKED HAM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | TRADITIONAL ITALIAN STYLE SWEET DRY CURED CAPOCOLLO | COOKED HAM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 1,607 MG | 714 MG |