TRADITIONAL FULLY-COOKED ROTISSERIE CHICKEN vs HAM FULLY COOKED STEAKS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
It's a tie — both foods score equally across 10 nutrient categories
TRADITIONAL FULLY-COOKED ROTISSERIE CHICKEN: 3
vs
HAM FULLY COOKED STEAKS: 3
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | TRADITIONAL FULLY-COOKED ROTISSERIE CHICKEN | HAM FULLY COOKED STEAKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 298 cal | 107 cal | |
| Protein | 22.6 g | 19.6 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 22.6 g | 2.7 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | TRADITIONAL FULLY-COOKED ROTISSERIE CHICKEN | HAM FULLY COOKED STEAKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0.7 MG | 0.3 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 643 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 298 MG | 929 MG |