TRADITIONAL FRIED PORK SKINS vs TOM'S
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
TOM'S wins in 3 out of 10 nutrient categories
TRADITIONAL FRIED PORK SKINS: 0
vs
TOM'S: 3
(7 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | TRADITIONAL FRIED PORK SKINS | TOM'S | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 571 cal | 571 cal | Tie |
| Protein | 50 g | 64.3 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 35.7 g | 32.1 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | TRADITIONAL FRIED PORK SKINS | TOM'S | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | TRADITIONAL FRIED PORK SKINS | TOM'S | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 2,214 MG | 3,429 MG |