TRADITIONAL FRIED PORK SKINS vs THIN QUINOA RICE CAKES
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
THIN QUINOA RICE CAKES wins in 5 out of 12 nutrient categories
TRADITIONAL FRIED PORK SKINS: 3
vs
THIN QUINOA RICE CAKES: 5
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | TRADITIONAL FRIED PORK SKINS | THIN QUINOA RICE CAKES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 571 cal | 400 cal | |
| Protein | 50 g | 0 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 80 g | |
| Fat | 35.7 g | 0 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | TRADITIONAL FRIED PORK SKINS | THIN QUINOA RICE CAKES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 0 UG | 0 UG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | TRADITIONAL FRIED PORK SKINS | THIN QUINOA RICE CAKES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 30 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 2 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 240 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 2,143 MG | 400 MG |