TRADITIONAL DRIED SAUSAGE vs CLASSIC BEEF FRANKS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
TRADITIONAL DRIED SAUSAGE wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
TRADITIONAL DRIED SAUSAGE: 5
vs
CLASSIC BEEF FRANKS: 2
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | TRADITIONAL DRIED SAUSAGE | CLASSIC BEEF FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 429 cal | 304 cal | |
| Protein | 17.9 g | 12.5 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 1.8 g | |
| Fat | 35.7 g | 28.6 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | TRADITIONAL DRIED SAUSAGE | CLASSIC BEEF FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 4.3 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | TRADITIONAL DRIED SAUSAGE | CLASSIC BEEF FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 5.1 MG | 1.3 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 1,036 MG | 929 MG |