TRADITIONAL CURE BACK BACON vs ORIGINAL FULLY COOKED BACON
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
TRADITIONAL CURE BACK BACON wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
TRADITIONAL CURE BACK BACON: 5
vs
ORIGINAL FULLY COOKED BACON: 2
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | TRADITIONAL CURE BACK BACON | ORIGINAL FULLY COOKED BACON | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 214 cal | 533 cal | |
| Protein | 13.5 g | 33.3 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 6.7 g | |
| Fat | 18.9 g | 40 g | |
| Fiber | 1.4 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | TRADITIONAL CURE BACK BACON | ORIGINAL FULLY COOKED BACON | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | TRADITIONAL CURE BACK BACON | ORIGINAL FULLY COOKED BACON | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 2.4 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 773 MG | 1,933 MG |