TRADITIONAL CRACKERS vs REDUCED FAT THIN WHEAT CRACKERS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
REDUCED FAT THIN WHEAT CRACKERS wins in 6 out of 11 nutrient categories
TRADITIONAL CRACKERS: 3
vs
REDUCED FAT THIN WHEAT CRACKERS: 6
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | TRADITIONAL CRACKERS | REDUCED FAT THIN WHEAT CRACKERS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 477 cal | 448 cal | |
| Protein | 10 g | 6.9 g | |
| Carbs | 63.3 g | 75.9 g | |
| Fat | 20 g | 12.1 g | |
| Fiber | 2 g | 10.3 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | TRADITIONAL CRACKERS | REDUCED FAT THIN WHEAT CRACKERS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | TRADITIONAL CRACKERS | REDUCED FAT THIN WHEAT CRACKERS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 33 MG | 69 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.8 MG | 3.7 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 310 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 997 MG | 793 MG |