TRADITIONAL BREAKFAST SAUSAGE LINKS vs HATFIELD
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
HATFIELD wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
TRADITIONAL BREAKFAST SAUSAGE LINKS: 3
vs
HATFIELD: 4
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | TRADITIONAL BREAKFAST SAUSAGE LINKS | HATFIELD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 218 cal | 500 cal | |
| Protein | 23.6 g | 28.6 g | |
| Carbs | 1.8 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 12.7 g | 35.7 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | TRADITIONAL BREAKFAST SAUSAGE LINKS | HATFIELD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | TRADITIONAL BREAKFAST SAUSAGE LINKS | HATFIELD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 36 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.3 MG | 2.6 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 1,018 MG | 2,857 MG |