TRADITIONAL BATARD SOURDOUGH vs HAMBURGER SLICED ENRICHED BUNS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
It's a tie — both foods score equally across 13 nutrient categories
TRADITIONAL BATARD SOURDOUGH: 5
vs
HAMBURGER SLICED ENRICHED BUNS: 5
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | TRADITIONAL BATARD SOURDOUGH | HAMBURGER SLICED ENRICHED BUNS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 250 cal | 283 cal | |
| Protein | 10.7 g | 7.6 g | |
| Carbs | 46.4 g | 54.7 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 3.8 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 1.9 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | TRADITIONAL BATARD SOURDOUGH | HAMBURGER SLICED ENRICHED BUNS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Niacin | 0 MG | 3.8 MG | |
| Riboflavin | 0 MG | 0.3 MG | |
| Thiamin | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | TRADITIONAL BATARD SOURDOUGH | HAMBURGER SLICED ENRICHED BUNS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 113 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.3 MG | 2.7 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 568 MG | 509 MG |