TOM & GLASSER vs MILK CHOCOLATE COVERED ROASTED ALMONDS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
MILK CHOCOLATE COVERED ROASTED ALMONDS wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
TOM & GLASSER: 4
vs
MILK CHOCOLATE COVERED ROASTED ALMONDS: 5
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | TOM & GLASSER | MILK CHOCOLATE COVERED ROASTED ALMONDS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 619 cal | 533 cal | |
| Protein | 21.4 g | 10 g | |
| Carbs | 16.7 g | 46.7 g | |
| Fat | 57.1 g | 40 g | |
| Fiber | 9.5 g | 6.7 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | TOM & GLASSER | MILK CHOCOLATE COVERED ROASTED ALMONDS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | TOM & GLASSER | MILK CHOCOLATE COVERED ROASTED ALMONDS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 143 MG | 200 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 2.6 MG | 3 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 433 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 310 MG | 33 MG |