TILAPIA SKINLESS AND BONELESS vs WILD CAUGHT ALASKAN SOCKEYE SALMON WHOLE FILLET
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
WILD CAUGHT ALASKAN SOCKEYE SALMON WHOLE FILLET wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
TILAPIA SKINLESS AND BONELESS: 3
vs
WILD CAUGHT ALASKAN SOCKEYE SALMON WHOLE FILLET: 5
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | TILAPIA SKINLESS AND BONELESS | WILD CAUGHT ALASKAN SOCKEYE SALMON WHOLE FILLET | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 88 cal | 159 cal | |
| Protein | 19.5 g | 22.1 g | |
| Carbs | 0.9 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 1.3 g | 7.1 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | TILAPIA SKINLESS AND BONELESS | WILD CAUGHT ALASKAN SOCKEYE SALMON WHOLE FILLET | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | TILAPIA SKINLESS AND BONELESS | WILD CAUGHT ALASKAN SOCKEYE SALMON WHOLE FILLET | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 7 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.6 MG | 0.4 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 359 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 35 MG | 62 MG |