TILAPIA FILLET vs SKINLESS & BONELESS ALASKA POLLOCK FILLETS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SKINLESS & BONELESS ALASKA POLLOCK FILLETS wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
TILAPIA FILLET: 3
vs
SKINLESS & BONELESS ALASKA POLLOCK FILLETS: 5
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | TILAPIA FILLET | SKINLESS & BONELESS ALASKA POLLOCK FILLETS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 80 cal | 73 cal | |
| Protein | 18.6 g | 17.3 g | |
| Carbs | 0.9 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 0.9 g | 0.7 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | TILAPIA FILLET | SKINLESS & BONELESS ALASKA POLLOCK FILLETS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | TILAPIA FILLET | SKINLESS & BONELESS ALASKA POLLOCK FILLETS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 18 MG | 13 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.3 MG | 0.3 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 333 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 31 MG | 160 MG |