THICK POHA vs 100% CALIFORNIA PREMIUM SHORT GRAIN RICE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
THICK POHA wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
THICK POHA: 5
vs
100% CALIFORNIA PREMIUM SHORT GRAIN RICE: 0
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | THICK POHA | 100% CALIFORNIA PREMIUM SHORT GRAIN RICE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 333 cal | 356 cal | |
| Protein | 6.7 g | 6.7 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 76.7 g | 80 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 6.7 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | THICK POHA | 100% CALIFORNIA PREMIUM SHORT GRAIN RICE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | THICK POHA | 100% CALIFORNIA PREMIUM SHORT GRAIN RICE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 1.2 MG | 0.8 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 67 MG | 22 MG |