THE BACKYARD FOOD COMPANY vs SABLE & ROSENFELD
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SABLE & ROSENFELD wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
THE BACKYARD FOOD COMPANY: 3
vs
SABLE & ROSENFELD: 5
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | THE BACKYARD FOOD COMPANY | SABLE & ROSENFELD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 100 cal | 435 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 4.4 g | |
| Carbs | 20 g | 13.0 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 43.5 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 4.3 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | THE BACKYARD FOOD COMPANY | SABLE & ROSENFELD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 60 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | THE BACKYARD FOOD COMPANY | SABLE & ROSENFELD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 87 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 267 MG | 304 MG |