TEMPURA BATTERED WILD CAUGHT HADDOCK FILLETS vs TAIL-OFF COOKED SHRIMP
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
TAIL-OFF COOKED SHRIMP wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
TEMPURA BATTERED WILD CAUGHT HADDOCK FILLETS: 3
vs
TAIL-OFF COOKED SHRIMP: 5
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | TEMPURA BATTERED WILD CAUGHT HADDOCK FILLETS | TAIL-OFF COOKED SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 239 cal | 96 cal | |
| Protein | 9.4 g | 21.2 g | |
| Carbs | 17.1 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 15.4 g | 0.9 g | |
| Fiber | 0.9 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | TEMPURA BATTERED WILD CAUGHT HADDOCK FILLETS | TAIL-OFF COOKED SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | TEMPURA BATTERED WILD CAUGHT HADDOCK FILLETS | TAIL-OFF COOKED SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 17 MG | 71 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.5 MG | 0.3 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 248 MG | 224 MG |