TAIL-OFF vs WILD-CAUGHT LING COD FILLET
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
TAIL-OFF wins in 5 out of 12 nutrient categories
TAIL-OFF: 5
vs
WILD-CAUGHT LING COD FILLET: 4
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | TAIL-OFF | WILD-CAUGHT LING COD FILLET | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 62 cal | 86 cal | |
| Protein | 13.4 g | 19.2 g | |
| Carbs | 0.9 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0.7 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | TAIL-OFF | WILD-CAUGHT LING COD FILLET | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 2.4 MG | |
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 0 UG | 0 UG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | TAIL-OFF | WILD-CAUGHT LING COD FILLET | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 27 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.2 MG | 0.7 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 80 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 429 MG | 132 MG |